Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review explores antimicrobial efficacy of natural and semi-synthetic chlorinated compounds against resistant strains, highlighting therapeutic possibilities.
Introduction/Objective: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become a global controversial issue, making conventional treatments less effective. Hence, the design and development of new and efficient antimicrobial agents are on the researchers’ agenda to reduce death rates and health care costs. In this regard, chlorine-containing compounds have been the center of attention. This review highlights the antimicrobial potential of chlorine-containing natural and semi-synthetic compounds, aiming to identify versatile candidates effective against microorganisms. Methods: The literature was comprehensively surveyed using Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, focusing on studies published since 2016, focusing on the antimicrobial properties of natural and semi-synthetic chlorinated compounds. Results: Natural chlorinated compounds have shown remarkable antimicrobial activity, generally more potent than their semi-synthetic counterparts. Discussion: The strong activity against resistant strains like MRSA underlines their therapeutic potential in addressing pressing clinical challenges. Nature-derived scaffolds serve as a promising foundation for the development of novel antimicrobial agents. Conclusion: Several naturally occurring compounds have proven more effective than their semisynthetic derivatives, making them attractive candidates for addressing the growing threat of AMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marefat et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: