Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 24, 2025Journal of Clinical MedicineOpen Access

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ZMZsolt MadaraszMLMichael LeitzMVMiljana Vladimirov

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective analysis highlights robotic surgery's benefits in perioperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic and open approaches.

Key Points

  • Robotic surgery resulted in shorter hospital stays and fewer complications than open surgery, suggesting it is advantageous for recovery.
  • Operative time was longer for robotic surgery at 304 minutes, while laparoscopic and open surgeries had shorter times of 221-222 minutes.
  • The quality of total mesorectal excision was high across all groups, but lymph node yield was highest in the laparoscopic group with 27.9 nodes.
  • Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar across all surgical approaches, indicating equivalent oncological efficacy.

Cite This Study

Madarasz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e14f8b2b6861e4c3fce2https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196743
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Total mesorectal excision quality in rectal cancer surgery affects local recurrence rate but not distant recurrence and survival: population-based cohort study2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis2021 · 54 citations
  3. 3Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Operative Technique and Review of the Literature2020 · 44 citations
  4. 4Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer2017 · 363 citations