Analysis reveals APOE4 exacerbates injury biomarkers, while MAPT may provide protective effects in fighters.
Long-term vulnerability to brain injury after repetitive head impacts (RHI) is poorly predicted in vivo. The wide heterogeneity of outcomes suggests that common genetic variants may act as modifiers of RHI-related neurodegeneration. Here, we tested whether APOE4 and MAPT H1/H2 haplotypes function as genetic modifiers of biomarker trajectories in 111 retired professional fighters from the Professional Athletes Brain Health Study (PABHS), the largest systematically characterized living cohort of fighters. RHI exposure was indexed by lifetime number of professional bouts. Primary outcomes included plasma GFAP (astroglial activation), NfL (axonal injury), and hippocampal volumes, measured cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Pre-specified linear models tested exposure x genotype interactions with false-discovery-rate correction. Across genotypes, greater fight exposure was associated with higher GFAP and smaller hippocampal volume. APOE4 modified longitudinal GFAP responses, with carriers showing stronger exposure-related increases than noncarriers, consistent with heightened astroglial reactivity. Conversely, the MAPT H2 haplotype mitigated associations between exposure, NfL, and hippocampal atrophy, suggesting partial protection against neuroaxonal injury and structural decline. Exploratory analyses showed MAPT H1/H1 enrichment among fighters meeting traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) criteria (OR=3.33). Plasma p-tau231 was unrelated to exposure, indicating these effects are unlikely to reflect concurrent Alzheimer-type tau pathology. Together, these findings provide in vivo evidence that APOE and MAPT act as genetic modifiers of RHI-related brain injury, complementing postmortem evidence linking MAPT to chronic traumatic encephalopathy and highlighting the potential of genotype-informed monitoring in contact-sport populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: