Why the study?
Are specific genetic polymorphisms associated with the risk of concussion in college athletes?
Are specific genetic polymorphisms associated with the risk of concussion in college athletes?
Specific genetic polymorphisms, including IL-6R CC and APOE4, are associated with altered risk of concussion in college athletes.
May inform concussion risk models in athletes; leaves open validation before any clinical genetic screening.
Background/aim To evaluate the association of genetic polymorphisms APOE, APOE G-219T promoter, microtubule associated protein(MAPT)/ tau exon 6 Ser 53 Pro, MAPT/ tau Hist 47 Tyr, IL-6 572 G/C and IL-6R Asp 358 Ala with the risk of concussion in college athletes. Methods A 23-centre prospective cohort study of 1056 college athletes with genotyping was completed between August 2003 and December 2012. All athletes completed baseline medical and concussion questionnaires, and post-concussion data were collected for athletes with a documented concussion. Results The study cohort consisted of 1056 athletes of mean±SD age 19.7±1.5 years , 89.3% male, 59.4% Caucasian, 35.0% African-American, 5.6% other race. The athletes participated in American football, soccer, basketball, softball, men’s wrestling and club rugby. A total of 133 (12.1% prevalence) concussions occurred during an average surveillance of 3 years per athlete. We observed a significant positive association between IL-6R CC (p=0.001) and a negative association between APOE 4 (p=0.03) and the risk of concussion. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between IL-6R CC and concussion (OR 3.48; 95% CI 1.58 to 7.65; p=0.002) and between the APOE4 allele and concussion (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.96; p=0.04), which persisted after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions IL-6R CC was associated with a three times greater concussion risk and APOE 4 with a 40% lower risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terrell et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: