This analysis reveals how independent directors' reputational incentives affect auditor selection, suggesting a link to governance mechanisms.
This study examines how independent directors' reputational incentives affect firms' demand for high-quality audit. We find that firms having a larger percentage of independent directors with low reputational concerns are more inclined to engage high-quality auditors. This evidence aligns with the notion that higher agency costs resulting from reduced monitoring by such directors increase firms' demand for enhanced third-party assurance. The relationship is attenuated in firms with stronger alternative governance mechanisms but is more pronounced in firms undergoing equity issuance. In addition, we document that high-quality auditors mitigate the adverse effects of independent directors' low reputational concerns on firms' financial reporting quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: