This paper reviews the complex and nuanced treatment of metaphysics in the first major works of Jacques Derrida (1967-72), and it supplements deconstruction with existential themes in order to safeguard it from the accusation of nihilistic relativism. The critique of logocentrism, often systematized through a paradoxical 'ontology of the trace', has been embraced by phenomenology and post-deconstruction, but also seen as insufficient for today's challenges. Returning to Derrida's demonstrations, I explore why metaphysics must be textual if it is to produce two operations constitutive of thinking: a certain technology of forgetting and an experience of meaning as singularized in words. This textuality is, specifically, that of writing, which reveals how, beyond truth, it is meaning-making that is sought by metaphysics and its writers. The techne of writing, then, plays a special role in individual, existential empowerment, but this interpretation of the history of ideas as a power struggle does not amount to moral relativism, because writing can help us sustain a unique and constructive passion for the margins.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuel Buchoul
University of Cambridge
Labyrinth
University of Cambridge
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuel Buchoul (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e1978b2b6861e4c40438 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v27i1.380
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: