Case report reveals malleus fixation causing persistent conductive hearing loss post-stapes surgery, indicating the need for careful surgical techniques.
Background/Objectives: Conductive hearing loss (CHL) recurrence or persistence after stapes surgery is often due to prosthesis displacement or malfunction, with malleus fixation being a less common cause. While persistent CHL linked to malleus fixation can be managed with appropriate diagnosis and surgical intervention, recurrent CHL cases remain poorly documented. This report describes a rare case of recurrent CHL due to malleus neck fixation, likely secondary to surgical trauma. Case Presentation: A 49-year-old woman underwent bilateral stapedectomy. CHL worsened after two years. CT showed right incus erosion and a left bony bridge. Revision surgery corrected the right side. Left tympanotomy revealed malleus fixation from a prior atticotomy. Removing the bony bridge restored ossicular mobility and hearing, stable at 6 and 12 months. Discussion: Malleus fixation after stapedectomy is rare and often related to congenital anomalies, chronic otitis media, tympanosclerosis, or surgical trauma. Bone dust or fragments from surgery may promote new bone formation, causing delayed fixation. Ossicular fixation can develop postoperatively and may be missed during primary surgery. High-resolution CT aids in diagnosis, especially in revision cases, while intraoperative palpation is key to detecting subtle abnormalities. Treatment options include ossicular mobilization, prosthesis revision, or chain reconstruction, tailored to the fixation’s location and severity. Conclusions: Surgical trauma should be considered a potential cause of recurrent CHL post-stapedectomy. Thorough removal of bone debris through aspiration and irrigation during surgery is essential to minimize this risk and optimize long-term hearing outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bettini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: