This EEG study reveals how olfactory valence influences neural dynamics and behavior in an approach-avoidance task.
Background/Objectives: Approach-avoidance behavior is critical for adaptive behavior. The neural basis of these behaviors has been investigated extensively, but the effect of odor valence is unclear. This study tested how positive, negative, and neutral odors affect behavior and event-related potentials (ERPs) in the approach-avoidance task (AAT). Methods: Thirty-two healthy participants performed an AAT. We measured reaction time, accuracy, and ERP components (P1, N1, N2, P3) to understand the process of motivational processing over time. Results: Participants responded faster and more accurately when the direction and target type were congruent under all odor conditions. Odors did not change this core consistent pattern. In contrast, ERP results revealed stage-specific modulations. P1 and N1 components reflected odor-related changes in early sensory processing. The N2 effect present under the air condition was largely absent under positive and negative odors. This suggests reduced conflict monitoring. P3 amplitudes were consistently larger for avoidance than for approach responses, regardless of odor valence. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that odor valence reorganized the neural dynamics of the AAT without changing behavioral performance. This finding shows that olfactory valence modulates attention and control mechanisms and plays a unique role in regulating human motivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: