Retrospective study analyzes outcomes of combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach in gallbladder cases, suggesting it is safe and effective.
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder disease. However, dense adhesions, severe inflammation, empyema, gangrene, impacted stones, choledocholithiasis and anatomical anomalies may render conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy unsafe. Methodology: This is a retrospective observational study included 130 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy or laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy between July 2012 and January 2025 at a tertiary referral centre. Preoperative evaluation included clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, ultrasonography in 100 (76.92%) or ultrasonography with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 30 (23.08%). Outcomes included operative details, postoperative recovery, complications and hospital stays. Statistical analysis utilized Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed in 85 (65.38%), laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was required in 43 (33.08%) and open conversion occurred in 2 (1.54%). Controlled bile leak developed in 53 (40.77%), resolving spontaneously in 35 (66.04%) within 15 to 21 days. Mean operative time was (2.14 ± 0.75) hours and mean hospital stay was (1.86 ± 1.0) days. Overall morbidity was 8 (6.15%), with complications including common bile duct stricture in 2 (1.54%), common bile duct injury in 1 (0.77%), hepatic artery injury in 1 (0.77%) and mortality in 1 (0.77%) from cardiac arrest unrelated to surgery. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy with mucosectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with common bile duct stenting when indicated, is a safe and effective approach in both acute and chronic cholecystitis, even in complex gallbladder cases which are technically difficult cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayesh Panchal (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: