This study evaluates an electronic platform for health-related quality of life in children undergoing radiation therapy, indicating its potential in clinical settings.
Introduction Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes are not routinely collected in paediatric radiation therapy (RT). This study co‐designed and evaluated an electronic platform to support routine HRQoL assessment using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods A digital platform was developed following a user‐centred design approach. Development included planning with consumers and clinicians, identifying user needs through interviews and iterative design refinements. Alpha testing was performed with consumers. Beta testing involved directed tasks by children, parents and clinician participants to evaluate the developed platform. Thematic analysis of participant feedback was performed to identify refinements and shape clinical implementation strategies. Results Iterative alpha testing with end‐users led to significant improvements in functionality and aesthetics. Beta testing involved 18 participants, including seven healthcare professionals, seven children and four parents. All participants successfully navigated the platform, completed tasks and interpreted PROM results. Participants described the platform as intuitive and child‐friendly. Challenges included minor navigation issues on mobile devices. Suggestions for improvement included streamlined result visualisation and enhancements to the instructional material. Whilst parents and clinicians recognised the value of allowing parents to view their child's PROM results, considerations to ensure sensitivity were described. Conclusion The electronic PROM platform was successfully developed to support HRQoL assessment of children undergoing RT. Future research is needed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doig et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: