Literature review assesses malocclusion impacts in Maharashtra's tribal areas, highlighting access challenges and cultural factors.
Introduction Oral health remains an overlooked aspect of healthcare in India’s tribal populations, despite its link to systemic diseases. Maharashtra’s tribes, including the Warli, Bhil, Katkari, and Mahadeo Koli, face disproportionate oral health burdens. Malocclusion, though prevalent, is rarely addressed due to poor access to orthodontic care. Objectives To assess oral health challenges, particularly malocclusion, in tribal communities of Maharashtra and to propose culturally sensitive, affordable strategies for improving orthodontic care access. Materials and Methods A literature review of peer-reviewed studies, government reports, and pilot programs was undertaken. Field observations from oral health camps in Palghar, Gadchiroli, and Nashik were incorporated. Surveys and interviews with healthcare workers, teachers, and community leaders explored perceptions and barriers. Results Barriers included geographic isolation, low income, cultural beliefs, and workforce shortages. Malocclusion affects 20–43% of Indian children, with early signs detected in 65–70% through school-based screenings. Mobile clinics improved access by 40%, tele-orthodontic consultations reported 90% satisfaction, and training of ASHAs/Anganwadi workers increased referrals by 25%. Removable and interceptive appliances, 70% cheaper than fixed appliances, improved treatment compliance. Conclusion Orthodontic care for tribal populations is both a challenge and an opportunity. Integrating traditional practices with modern orthodontics, while improving awareness, affordability, and accessibility, can reduce disparities. Scalable, community-based interventions in Maharashtra may serve as models for national implementation, supporting progress toward the Sustainable Development Goal of Good Health and well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: