Prospective cohort study validates a prediction model using bone quality score for vertebral fractures, suggesting clinical implications.
The vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score is used to assess bone quality using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to perform internal validation of a previously developed prediction model for the occurrence of new vertebral fractures (NVFs) over 11 years using the VBQ score. A prospective cohort of 157 participants from the Minami-Aizu study, with lumbar MRI follow-ups over 11 years, was analyzed from an initial 200-participant cohort, applying the exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of NVFs over 11 years. The predictors included age, sex, existing vertebral fractures at baseline, and VBQ scores. The prediction model, constructed using multiple logistic regression analysis and the Akaike information criterion, was evaluated for its discrimination power using the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). Internal validation was performed using the bootstrapping method with model reconstruction through regularization to correct for overfitting. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, predictors with a p-value of less than 0.10 in multiple logistic regression analysis and less than 0.05 in other analyses were considered statistically significant. NVFs occurred in 29 of the 157 participants. The AUC of the original model was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.92). Bootstrapping revealed overfitting, which led to model reconstruction with regularization. The AUC of the regularized model was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.91), with no significant overfitting. The regularized model showed discrimination power equivalent to that of the original model without overfitting. A prediction model corrected for overfitting may be effective for long-term VF prediction. Future studies should investigate the external validity and clinical impact of the model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yokota et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: