Retrospective cohort study analyzes vitamin D testing patterns and deficiency outcomes, indicating demographic disparities.
Objective: Although guidelines recommend targeted vitamin D testing for high-risk populations, testing has increased globally. Limited studies have examined real-world testing patterns and their relationship with deficiency outcomes. This study investigates trends, demographic determinants, and deficiency outcomes associated with voluntary vitamin D testing among Taiwanese adults. Design: A retrospective cohort study analyzing electronic medical records to assess vitamin D testing trends, demographic predictors of deficiency, and status changes following consecutive tests within two years. Vitamin D status was classified based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels as deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20–29.9 ng/mL), or sufficient (≥30 ng/mL). Setting: A tertiary medical center in Taiwan. Participants: Between 2013 and 2022, 13,381 outpatients underwent voluntary vitamin D testing. After excluding those aged <18 years, with advanced renal disease, osteomalacia, rickets, or hyperparathyroidism, 8,383 were included in the final analysis. Results: Testing increased sharply after 2019. Although women underwent twice as many tests, men had a higher deficiency prevalence (56.94% vs. 53.01%). Adults aged 18–34 had the highest prevalence (67.81%). Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists ordered the most tests, particularly for female infertility, with 65.73% of patients deficient. Among those with repeat tests, deficiency prevalence decreased from 60% to 43.25%. Conclusions: The increase in voluntary vitamin D testing with demographic disparities highlights the importance of understanding testing behaviors and public health implications. Improved vitamin D status at follow-up suggests potential benefits in identifying high-risk individuals and emphasizes the need for further research to evaluate outcomes and guide prevention strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: