This review demonstrates open wedge high tibial osteotomy improves functional outcomes in gonarthrosis, suggesting its role as a joint preservation alternative to total knee arthroplasty.
Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (OWHTO) has gained clinical momentum as a joint-preserving surgical technique for managing early to moderate medial compartment gonarthrosis, especially in younger, active patients with varus deformity. In contrast to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), OWHTO preserves native joint anatomy and function, offering a biomechanically sound alternative with the potential to delay or avoid prosthetic intervention. The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the current state of evidence regarding OWHTO, with particular emphasis on patient selection criteria, surgical planning and fixation techniques, clinical outcomes, complication profiles, and long-term survivorship. This review also aims to identify limitations in the existing body of literature and propose areas for future research. A focused literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases. Studies published between January 2015 and March 2025 were screened using keywords such as “open wedge high tibial osteotomy,” “OWHTO,” “gonarthrosis,” “medial compartment osteoarthritis,” and “joint preservation.” A total of eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, retrospective cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and long-term case series. Data were extracted on surgical technique, fixation methods, outcome measures, follow-up duration, and reported limitations. The reviewed literature demonstrates that OWHTO offers consistent improvements in functional outcomes, including KOOS, WOMAC, IKDC, OKS, HSS, and SF-12 scores. Long-term survivorship reached up to 91.5% at 13.6 years in selected patients. Common surgical tools included TomoFix and Puddu plates, with fixation technique often influencing union rate and complication frequency. However, substantial heterogeneity exists across studies in terms of surgical reporting, fixation types, and patient demographics. Overcorrection beyond mechanical axis alignment targets was associated with increased complication rates without proportional functional gain. Most studies lacked detail on mean age, BMI, comorbidities, and rehabilitation protocols, limiting the generalizability of outcomes. OWHTO remains a clinically effective and biomechanically advantageous intervention for early-stage medial knee osteoarthritis in appropriately selected patients. The technique is associated with durable mid- to long-term outcomes, reduced pain, and improved functional capacity, with the added benefit of postponing or avoiding total knee arthroplasty.: Future research should prioritize standardized reporting of surgical techniques, fixation systems, and patient stratification. High-quality, multicenter prospective trials are needed to develop uniform treatment algorithms and better identify predictive factors for successful outcomes. Inclusion of long-term patient-reported outcomes and complication profiles will be essential for guiding surgical decision-making and health policy integration. This review included three systematic/meta-analyses and eight original studies encompassing over 6,500 cases. Follow-up durations ranged from 5 to 13.6 years. Despite methodological differences, the consensus across studies supports OWHTO as a valuable alternative in the spectrum of knee-preserving interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vejseli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: