Genomic analysis reveals climatic anomalies have a stronger effect than size-selective harvesting on Lottia gigantea, highlighting critical conservation needs.
Coastal organisms live in a dynamic environment where a myriad of environmental stressors, including climate change, ocean acidification, and human harvesting, act on variable spatio‐temporal scales. Each of these stressors may impose unique selective forces on a population, shaping a species' adaptive potential and its ability to persist under future climatic conditions. Genomic investigations of adaptive responses to environmental and anthropogenic disturbances remain rare, especially in marine systems. Here, we use whole genome sequencing data from the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea , and outlier detection methods to pinpoint signals of selection (1) across long‐standing environmental gradients spanning the species' distribution, (2) at the poleward edge of the species' range where it experienced a recent expansion, and (3) between sites vulnerable to or protected from human size‐selective harvesting within California. Loci associated with environmental gradients across the entire range show the strongest differentiation at the southern end of the species' range, potentially driven by adaptation to sea surface temperature and pH. Additional ad‐hoc outlier analyses revealed a distinct set of loci potentially under selection in the expanded range, with different functional roles than the range‐wide outliers. Despite demographic models suggesting that protection from harvesting has a positive impact on the abundance of large individuals, we did not find strong signals of selection or changes in genetic diversity between sites differing in harvesting vulnerability. Our findings suggest that range‐wide environmental selective signals established over longer time scales are distinct from those imposed by climatic anomalies at finer spatio‐temporal scales. We found that climatic variation has a stronger selective imprint than human harvesting, and thus conservation interventions should consider prioritizing the maintenance of climate‐related adaptive potential. Understanding how climatic trends and anomalies interact with anthropogenic pressures will allow us to make more informed decisions to sustain the evolutionary capacity of L. gigantea and other key coastal species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielsen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: