Study compares ChatGPT effectiveness in higher education for Pakistani and Saudi students, indicating cultural factors influence engagement and motivation.
Cultural considerations affect ChatGPT's efficacy in higher education, as shown in a study of Pakistani (N = 152) and Saudi (N = 138) students. The research examines how national context influences students' motivation, engagement, satisfaction, and attitudes toward AI tools, using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Hofstede's cultural dimensions as frameworks. A validated 22-item questionnaire measured the perceived educational value of ChatGPT, revealing significantly higher usage and effectiveness ratings among Pakistani students compared to Saudi students (M = 3.92 vs. 3.48, p < 0.01). Moderated regression analysis indicated that national context accounted for 44% of the variance in motivation (η² = 0.44), highlighting ChatGPT's role in compensating for resource shortages in some settings while enhancing resources in others. Crucially, the study demonstrates ChatGPT's significant impact on language learning outcomes, particularly in enhancing writing proficiency, text summarization skills, and idea generation capabilities (p < 0.01). Pakistani students reported significantly greater engagement with ChatGPT for these language learning tasks, suggesting its potential as a powerful language learning tool in resource-limited settings. This study contributes to the growing body of research on AI in language instruction and underscores the importance of integrating culturally relevant methodologies into the use of AI in education. It offers recommendations for educators and policymakers, advocating adapted strategies that address specific educational and linguistic requirements. Overall, this research combines AI, education, and linguistics, emphasizing the cultural importance of AI tools and laying the groundwork for future studies in AI-assisted language learning worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alharbi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: