Mouse models reveal MHC disparity disrupts thymus function and impacts T-cell recovery, suggesting potential pathways for intervention.
Clinical studies have demonstrated that recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), particularly those undergoing HLA-haploidentical alloHCT (haploHCT), exhibit significant immune deficiencies. However, the extent to which major histocompatibility complex (MHC) disparity independently contributes to the observed lymphocyte deficiency post-alloHCT remains unclear. While MHC matching is crucial for thymic selection of T lymphocytes, it has yet to be reported whether haploHCT alters recipient thymus homeostasis compared to MHC-matched HCT and which signaling pathways are implicated in this alteration. In this study, we established mouse models of MHC- matched and haploidentical HCT without any transplant-associated complications. Our findings indicated that MHC disparity significantly disrupted thymic architecture, suppressed thymus-specific gene expression, and resulted in impaired T-cell recovery and functionality following transplantation. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis revealed abnormally enhanced interactions involving TGFB1-TGFBR3 and LRP6-CKLF between thymic lymphocytes and epithelial cells in haploHCT recipients. Furthermore, agonists targeting the TGF-β1 and LRP6 pathways were found to compromise the functional characteristics of normal thymic T cells; conversely, appropriate inhibition of these pathways restored the differentiation and maturation phenotypes of thymic T cells derived from haploHCT recipients. Our study elucidates the independent role of MHC disparity in regulating thymus homeostasis and T-cell recovery while identifying the functional involvement of the TGF-β1 and LRP6 pathways in this context. These findings provide novel insights into the mechanisms underlying immune recovery as well as potential therapeutic strategies for modulating thymic functions following haploHCT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: