Field analysis reveals significant spatial distribution patterns among 12 tree species, indicating competitive interactions and environmental influences.
The spatial distribution of plant species is a crucial indicator of the mechanisms driving competition or coexistence both within and between populations and communities. Analyzing these patterns provides essential insights into fundamental ecological processes and aids in evaluating ecological hypotheses. To study the spatial distribution of dominant tree species and their associations both within and among species, we established a 25-hectare forest plot in Lushan Mountain. We employed the g(r) function alongside three null models—complete spatial randomness (CSR), heterogeneous Poisson (HP), and antecedent condition (AC)—to analyze spatial patterns and assess species interactions at various life stages. Additionally, we examined the relationships between spatial distributions and environmental factors such as soil properties and topography using Berman’s test. Our results showed that all 12 dominant tree species exhibited significant aggregation under the CSR model; however, the scales of aggregation were reduced under the HP model. We also found evidence of aggregation among multiple species across different life stages and tree layers under CSR. Notably, this pattern persisted under the AC model but was limited to specific spatial scales. Furthermore, elevation, topographical convexity, and the total content of soil nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) were identified as statistically significant predictors of species distributions. Overall, these findings highlight that both biological and environmental factors play a vital role in shaping plant spatial patterns across different scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: