Analysis reveals that early-life sleep disruption affects neurotype matching and social affinity in prairie voles, indicating similarities to human autism.
Studies of human sociability indicate stronger social affinity in matched-neurotype dyads (e.g., two individuals with autism or two without) compared to mixed-neurotype dyads (e.g., one individual with autism paired with one without). Is this neurotype matching phenomenon also quantifiable in non-human animals? Using deep learning tools, we analyzed dyadic male-female interactions in prairie voles, a highly social rodent species. To simulate “neurotypes”, voles were exposed to either control conditions or early-life sleep disruption (ELSD) during a critical neurodevelopmental period (postnatal days 14-21), recapitulating two features of human autism: developmental sleep disruption and later-life atypical sociability. Analogous to human studies, voles showed signs of reduced social affinity in mixed dyads compared to matched dyads, including sex-specific changes in aggression and body orientation toward the conspecific. These findings advance our understanding of social affinity, providing a framework for new studies in both animal models and humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bueno-Júnior et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: