Observational analysis identifies predictive Clinically relevant biomarkers in microbiome studies, suggesting enhanced disease management.
Aims Identifying biomarkers that reflect the complex relationship between the microbiome and health outcomes in microbiome studies is essential for advancing the understanding and improving disease management. While past research was focused on a single biomarker modeling approach, this study extends that work by combining multiple taxa to identify a subset of multiple biomarkers relevant to clinical outcomes. Methods and Results We extend the information theory framework for surrogate endpoint evaluation (Alonso and Molenberghs, 2007) by applying LASSO and Elastic Net models (Zou and Hastie, 2005; Hastie et al., 2015) to identify combinations of taxa as biomarkers for clinical outcomes. Feature selection for the biomarker’s construction is done in order to maximize the goodness of fit of the predictive biomarker model. Monte Carlo cross validation is used to enhance the reliability of feature selection. The high salt diet (HSD) study on mice, is used to illustrate the methodology for continuous outcome (tumor size). The top 5 selected genera yielded a correlation of 0.9274 between predicted and observed tumor size, with a 67.92% reduction in uncertainty when the multiple microbiome biomarkers score is known. To illustrate the methodology for binary outcome, the CERTIFI study on Crohn’s disease patients treated with ustekinumab is used. A multiple microbiome biomarkers score, constructed using the top 5 selected families, significantly improved prediction of remission 6 weeks after induction treatment (the clinical outcome of interest). Conclusions This study presents a unified approach for identifying multiple microbiome biomarkers using penalized regression for clinical outcome prediction. The proposed methods are applied to both continuous and binary outcomes. The method enhances the detection of meaningful biomarkers with potential for personalized treatment and disease management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: