Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 27, 2025

The Mechanisms of the Masked Priming That Do Not Work Jointly.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

YWYongchun WangMDMeilin DiHZHuiru Zhang

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Digital masked prime task reveals distinct roles of motor inhibition and object updating in the negative compatibility effect.

Key Points

  • The negative compatibility effect was influenced by the context of the masked stimuli, differentiating between relevant and irrelevant conditions.
  • In the relevant condition, object updating was the primary mechanism behind the negative compatibility effect observed.
  • Motor inhibition solely explained the negative compatibility effect in the irrelevant condition, indicating differing mechanisms at play.
  • Response time analysis over three days demonstrated that the negative compatibility effect increased with response latency in certain contexts.

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7cc66eebfec0fc5238979https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70118
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Two fundamentally different mechanisms by which unconscious information impairs behavioral performance: Evidence from fMRI and computational modeling2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2How hierarchical models improve point estimates of model parameters at the individual level2016 · 150 citations
  3. 3A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: Are they qualitatively different?2013 · 89 citations
  4. 4Different time courses for visual perception and action priming2003 · 463 citations
  5. 5The internal temporal dynamic of unconscious inhibition related to weak stimulus–response associations2019 · 8 citations