Randomized clinical trial assessed tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation with bleaching gel, suggesting effective esthetic outcomes.
This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), and esthetic self-perception of in-office dental bleaching using a bleaching gel 1 week after mixing. Forty subjects underwent in-office bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost PF, Ultradent). In a splitmouth design, each maxillary hemiarch received bleaching gel that was mixed during, or 1 week before, the treatment session. The bleaching procedure was performed in two sessions of 40 minutes with a 7-day interval. Tooth color was assessed before treatment, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after the end of bleaching, using a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade; ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) and subjective scales (Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide; ΔSGU). The risk and intensity of TS and GI were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Esthetic self-perception was assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (0-10). Satisfactory bleaching was achieved in both groups, with no significant differences for objective (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID; p>0.72) or subjective (ΔSGU [shade guide units], p>0.84) color assessments. No significant differences were found in the risk and intensity of TS (p=0.79; p=0.67) or GI (p=1.0; p=0.85). Patients' esthetic self-perceptions changed after the procedure (p<0.009), mainly on the tooth color question (p<0.001). In-office dental bleaching with Opalescence Boost PF 40% remained effective, without differences in risk and intensity of TS and GI, even 1 week after mixing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freitas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: