Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 27, 2025Journal of Clinical MedicineOpen Access

A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Robot-Assisted and Conventional Fluoroscopy-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HSHany M.A. SeifEMEmanuele MaragnoMGMarco Gallus

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective cohort study shows robot-assisted surgery improves screw placement accuracy in patients, suggesting clinical advantages.

Key Points

  • Robot-assisted surgery achieved 93.33% accuracy in screw placement, significantly higher than 78.76% in the conventional group.
  • The odds ratio for optimal screw placement with robot assistance was 3.78 (95% CI: 1.55–9.19, p = 0.003).
  • This retrospective cohort study evaluated 218 patients to assess screw placement accuracy and clinical outcomes.
  • Robot-assisted procedures reduced estimated blood loss and length of stay while improving patient-reported outcomes.

Cite This Study

Seif et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7cc6aeebfec0fc5238bafhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196831
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating accuracy in robotic-assisted thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement: Insights from a single-center study of 410 patients2025
  2. 2Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement achieves high accuracy and narrows the experience gap: a preclinical evaluation2026
  3. 3The accuracy of navigated vs. robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a retrospective single-centre comparative study2026
  4. 4Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Populations - Meta-analysis2025
  5. 5Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws2017 · 144 citations