PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Clinical Transplantation2 citationsOpen Access

The Changing Transplant Landscape in the Era of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Word of Caution

View Full Paper
JSJulie SemenchukETEliza Tuff‐GordonXMXiayi Ma

Key Points

  • The one-year survival probability decreased from 84.2% pre-elexacaftor to 62.5% post-elexacaftor.
  • Of 22 lung transplants in 2019, 19 were primary procedures, whereas 8 out of 11 were primary in the post-elexacaftor era.
  • None of the post-elexacaftor era transplant recipients had the deltaF508 variant, which was present in 84% of recipients before ETI.
  • Lung transplant recipients post-elexacaftor exhibited increased complexity and high-risk characteristics compared to earlier cohorts.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically changed the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, including in those who require lung transplantation. The objectives of the study were to describe the cohort demographics and outcomes of primary lung transplant recipients before and after the availability of ETI. Methods This is a descriptive study of lung transplants performed at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program for CF during two time periods: 2019 (pre‐ETI era) and 2021–2023 (post‐ETI era). All subjects were referred from the Adult CF program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Data were obtained from chart review and the Toronto Lung Transplant database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival probability at 1 year post‐transplant. Results There were 22 lung transplants performed in 2019 (19 86.4% primary and 3 13.6% re‐transplants) compared to 11 lung transplants (8 72.7% primary and 3 27.3% re‐transplants) in the post‐ETI era. In primary transplant recipients, median age was 29.4 years (Range 18.6–67.6 years) in 2019 compared to 30.0 years (Range 19.1–64.0 years) in 2021–2023. In the post‐ETI era, none of the individuals had a deltaF508 variant, compared to 84% in 2019. One‐year survival probability was lower in the post‐ETI era (62.5% vs. 84.2%, respectively). Conclusion Lung transplant recipients in the post‐ETI era were more complex with high‐risk characteristics and had worse post‐transplant outcomes. This study highlights the importance of further investigation to better understand the impact of ETI on transplant referral patterns, recipient characteristics, and post‐transplant outcomes in the CF population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Semenchuk et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7cc6aeebfec0fc5238cfahttps://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70317
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience2023 · 9 citations
  2. 2The Global Impact of COVID-19 on Solid Organ Transplantation: Two Years Into a Pandemic2022 · 105 citations
  3. 3Survival Differences Following Lung Transplantation Among US Transplant Centers2010 · 149 citations
  4. 4The French Compassionate Program of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis with advanced lung disease and no F508delCFTRvariant2023 · 93 citations
  5. 5Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis2020 · 59 citations