Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research employs DI-TFME for extracting neonicotinoid insecticides in water, highlighting its analytical performance.
Herein, cellulose acetate membrane modified with polyethylene terephthalate derived MIL-101(Fe) (PET-MIL-101(Fe)) was used as an extraction phase for the direct immersion-thin film microextraction method (DI-TFME) of neonicotinoid insecticides in water samples. The quantitative analysis of clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam was carried out using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC-DAD). The morphological and structural characteristics of the materials were studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX). Under optimum conditions, acceptable analytical performance for the developed DI-TFME/HPLC-DAD method was attained. The linearity of the method ranged from 0.04 to 500 µg/L with R2 ranging from 0.9981 to 0.9989. The detection limits, quantification limits and relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the DI-TFME/HPLC-DAD method were in the range of 0.013–0.016 µg/L, 0.043–0.053 µg/L and 1.2–3.9%, respectively. The method was applied in the analysis of real water samples, and the spiking recoveries of the target analytes were 95.6–102%, 91.2–98.6% and 79.2‒98.7% for river water, effluent and influent samples, respectively, with %RSDs ranging from 1.8 to 4.8%. These findings demonstrated that the developed DI-TFME/HPLC-DAD method had high precision, accuracy, sensitivity and enrichment factor (73–88). The DI-TFME/HPLC-DAD method proved sustainable for the simultaneous quantification of trace neonicotinoid insecticides in real samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakavula et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: