Novel deep learning model improves classification accuracy for monkeypox in skin lesions, suggesting enhanced diagnostic capabilities.
Monkeypox has arisen as a global health issue, requiring prompt and precise diagnosis for optimal management. Conventional diagnostic techniques, including PCR, are dependable yet frequently unattainable in resource-constrained environments. Deep learning demonstrates potential in automating disease detection from skin lesion images; nevertheless, current models are hindered by limits in feature extraction and misclassification challenges. This paper presents an attention-augmented deep learning architecture to enhance classification accuracy for monkeypox and other dermatological conditions. This work presents a model based on EfficientNetB7, augmented with coordinate attention to enhance feature extraction and classification accuracy. The Monkeypox Skin Lesion Dataset (MSLD v2.0) is utilised, incorporating pre-processing methods such as image normalisation, scaling, and data augmentation. Diverse edge detection techniques are examined to enhance feature representation. The model is subjected to five-fold cross-validation and is evaluated against Xception, Swin Transformer, ResNet-50, MobileNetV2, and baseline EfficientNet models, utilising accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC as assessment measures. Our model attains an unparalleled accuracy of 99.99%, precision of 99.8%, recall of 99.9%, F1-score of 99.85%, and an AUC of 100%. In contrast to previous studies that indicated a maximum accuracy of 98.81%, our methodology markedly diminishes false negatives and improves generalisation. This research sets a novel standard for AI-based monkeypox detection, showcasing exceptional accuracy and resilience. The results endorse the incorporation of AI-driven diagnostic tools in clinical and telemedicine settings, with prospects for immediate implementation and extensive epidemiological monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mousa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: