Descriptive analysis reveals strong links between stakeholder collaboration and operational performance, highlighting challenges in community and donor engagement.
Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organizations (HNGOs) in Kenya stand at the frontline of disaster relief, yet their effectiveness is often tested by fragmented coordination, donor conditionalities, and inconsistent community engagement. This study set out to examine how stakeholder collaboration—across communities, government agencies, and donor institutions—shapes the operational performance of disaster and relief NGOs. Guided by Stakeholder Theory, Social Network Theory, and Relief Coordination Theory, the study employed a descriptive and explanatory design, surveying 80 NGOs through stratified random sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis, with reliability confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha (>0.70) and validity through factor loadings (>0.5). The findings reveal a compelling narrative: while government collaboration emerged as the strongest contributor to operational effectiveness (M = 4.50, SD = 0.675), community participation (M = 4.05, SD = 0.840) and donor engagement (M = 3.56, SD = 0.672) showed uneven application, reflecting both opportunities and gaps. Regression analysis confirmed a strong, positive relationship between stakeholder collaboration and performance (β = 0.813, p < 0.001), with collaboration explaining 66.1% of the variance in operational outcomes (R² = 0.661; F = 152.146, p < 0.001). These results underscore collaboration not as a peripheral input, but as a strategic enabler of responsiveness, accountability, and adaptability in humanitarian supply chains. The study recommends strengthening government coordination mechanisms, enhancing structured donor communication systems, and institutionalizing standardized community feedback frameworks, while policymakers should develop a national coordination framework and enforce minimum donor engagement standards. Recognizing its Kenya-specific context, the study calls for further research to explore causal mechanisms, stakeholder-specific impacts, mediating and moderating variables, cross-cultural validation, and the role of digital technologies in enhancing collaboration. Ultimately, the findings remind us that in the fragile terrain of humanitarian response, collaboration is not merely cooperation—it is the heartbeat of operational performance, and its strengthening could redefine resilience in Kenya’s humanitarian ecosystem and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhande et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: