Using a wavefunction-based descriptor, this research identifies metrics for predicting singlet-triplet inversion in INVEST dyes, suggesting significant efficiency implications.
The design of organic emitters with inverted singlet-triplet (INVEST) gaps presents a promising route to enhance triplet harvesting in optoelectronic applications, yet reliable descriptors for predicting this phenomenon remain scarce. Here, we introduce a wavefunction-based descriptor, Q_a^t, derived from the transition density matrix, to quantify the short-range charge transfer (SRCT) character and transition charges localization on atomic-sites, critical for singlet-triplet inversion. Through a systematic computational study of N-triangulenes, extended π-systems, and non-alternant hydrocarbons, we demonstrate that Q_a^t≥1.4 correlates with negative singlet-triplet gap values computed at the SCS-CC2 level, offering a reliable and universal metric for inversion prediction. The trend in the Q_a^t values remain consistent at the TDA-DFT level, with the descriptor exhibiting small variations across ground- and excited-state geometries, enabling efficient screening with a cost-effective procedure. Our findings underscore Q_a^t as a versatile tool for INVEST design, bypassing the need for high-level correlated methods while providing insights into the relationship between electronic structure and inversion. We further analyze the excited state decay kinetics of INVEST dyes by computing their fluorescence (k_f), intersystem crossing (k_ISC), and reverse intersystem crossing (k_RISC) rate constants, revealing that Herzberg-Teller effects dominate the spin conversion processes. For the investigated INVEST dyes, larger k_ISC values are systematically calculated with respect to the k_RISC values. However, several dyes exhibit k_RISC values exceeding 105 s−1, indicating promising potential for efficient delayed fluorescence. This work advances both the theoretical framework of excited-state dynamics in INVEST systems and the design of efficient organic emitters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badawy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: