Prospective randomized trial finds no significant differences in clinical outcomes or graft healing between ACL reconstruction methods, suggesting similar effectiveness.
1Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA R. A. Teitge, Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3990 John R Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA, Email: [email protected] This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article "All-inside ACL Reconstruction Offers No Advantage in Clinical Outcomes, Graft Healing, or Tunnel Widening Compared With the Complete Tibial Tunnel Technique: A Prospective Randomized Trial" by Okutan and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003638. The author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writer, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert A. Teitge (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: