Immunohistochemical analysis reveals elevated 8-OHdG levels in oral cancer tissues, indicating oxidative stress implications.
Objective: The present immunohistochemical investigation attempted to evaluate the concentrations of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a prospective DNA damage biomarker in primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients compared to healthy tissues to analyse the immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining intensity levels across different histopathological levels of OSCC. Materials and Methods: The control group consisted of tissue samples from the normal mucosa (n = 10). The study groups consisted of tissue blocks sourced from patients with primary OSCC (n = 55). The principal antibody utilised was 8-OHdG Antibody, and a control specimen was treated identically to the OSCC group but treated in non-immune serum rather than the primary antibody. The data were estimated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. The Fisher’s exact test was employed to examine the variations between the sample groups at a 5% significance level. Results: The OSCC group had 20 well-differentiated (WD), 20 moderately differentiated (MD), and 15 poorly differentiated (PD) samples. Compared to normal tissue samples, a marked elevation of 8-OHdG antigen production was observed in OSCC tissue samples ( P < 0.0001). The WD cohort showed moderate expression of the 8-OHdG antigen in 50%, mild in 30%, and intense in 20%. In MD samples, 5% showed intense expression, moderate in 55%, and mild staining in 40%. In PD samples, 46.67% showed mild and moderate 8-OHdG expression, whereas 6.66% showed intense expression. However, the difference was insignificant ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: The Oxidative stress (OS) marker 8-OHdG has higher concentrations in the tissue samples with OSCC than in healthy tissues and serves as a predictive biomarker for OSCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohideen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: