Study compares learning and memory patterns in SCA12 patients and healthy controls, indicating significant impairments in verbal recall.
Objective Spinocerebellar ataxia type 12 (SCA12) is a rare neurodegenerative movement disorder highly prevalent in an ethnic community in India. Prior studies have suggested that cognitive domains—particularly memory—may be compromised. We aim to compare patterns of learning and memory between SCA12 patients and healthy controls. Method We recruited 11 genetically confirmed SCA12 patients through a neurology hospital in eastern India. 12 controls were matched for age, gender, community, and years of education. We administered a neuropsychological battery to all participants through home visits. We evaluated global cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and verbal learning and memory using the adapted CERAD word list learning task. Results MoCA scores were not significantly different between SCA12 patients and healthy controls although the patients tended to have a lower score. SCA12 patients showed a significant impairment in learning across 3 trials. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant group effect (p=0.03) and trial effect (p< 0.0001). Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons test showed that both patients and controls recalled a similar number of words in T1 (p=0.4) and T3 (p=0.4), but controls recalled a significantly greater number of words in T2 (p=0.02). Importantly, while delayed recall continued to be poorer in SCA12 patients, delayed recognition was not affected (Two-tailed unpaired t-test, for recall: p=0.03, for recognition: p=0.3). Conclusion Our preliminary results indicate that verbal learning and recall, but not recognition, are impaired in SCA12 patients, suggesting that initial encoding remains relatively preserved. Further data collection and subgroup analysis may reveal differences based on gender or educational attainment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: