Novel machine learning models improve accuracy in detecting water pollution sources, indicating better management strategies.
Abstract This study presents a novel hybrid framework for rapid and robust identification of sudden water pollution sources by integrating machine learning (ML) with numerical modeling, enabling high-precision inversion of source parameters while quantifying their uncertainties. A MIKE21 hydrodynamic-water quality model of the Dongliao River was developed to generate a synthetic dataset, which was used to train and evaluate long short-term memory (LSTM), kernel extreme learning machine (KELM), and support vector machine (SVM) surrogate models. Among them, the LSTM achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.98, RMSE = 0.03) and was selected for further integration. For deterministic source identification, a whale optimization algorithm (WOA)-LSTM model was developed, reducing the average inversion error to 6.89% (source location error < 3%) and computation time to 233 seconds. A probabilistic inversion system was subsequently established by coupling the WOA-LSTM model with a Bayesian framework, which characterized the posterior probability distributions of source parameters with an average error of 5.26%. To assess robustness, a comparative analysis under a 5% data noise scenario revealed that the probabilistic approach achieved an average relative error of 5.39%, representing a 47.2% improvement over the deterministic method’s 10.22% error. These findings demonstrate that integrating a physics-informed ML surrogate with Bayesian inference effectively addresses uncertainty and computational cost in environmental inverse problems, offering a powerful tool for intelligent early warning and precise management of sudden water pollution incidents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: