Cross-sectional survey finds strength use predicts flourishing in Indian university students, highlighting authenticity and emptiness as mediators.
Background: Flourishing is increasingly recognized as a vital indicator of student well-being, yet little is known about its predictors and mechanisms in collectivist, high-pressure educational contexts. This study examined whether strength use predicts flourishing among Indian university students, with authenticity and subjective emptiness as mediators, and gender as a moderator. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 426 students (analytic N = 322; 75% female; M age = 22.2 years) recruited from classrooms across colleges in Bangalore, India. Participants completed validated measures of strength use, authenticity (authentic living, self-alienation, external influence), subjective emptiness, and flourishing. Data were analyzed using multiple regression and bootstrapped mediation models (PROCESS v4.0). Results: Strength use strongly predicted flourishing (β = .58, p < .001). Authentic living (β = .30, p < .001) and emptiness (β = –.19, p < .001) partially mediated this relationship, whereas external influence and self-alienation were non-significant. Gender did not significantly predict flourishing. The model explained 71.9% of the variance in flourishing. Conclusions: Findings highlight strength use as a robust predictor of flourishing, with authenticity and emptiness serving as key mechanisms. Implications include embedding strengths-based, authenticity-supportive, and meaning-focused interventions into higher education curricula and counseling services, tailored to cultural contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanghvi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: