Axiomatic meta-theorem produces O(log log n) randomized algorithms for maximal independent set and matching in scale-free networks, indicating efficient performance across various configurations.
Abstract We prove an axiomatic meta-theorem that yields O(log log n)-round randomized algorithms for maximal independent set (MIS) and maximal matching on broad classes of scale-free networks. Our framework unifies two settings: (i) geometry-driven rank-1 models (e.g., GIRG and soft-HRG) via a single high-probability “uniformity” event E that regularizes occupancies, cross-edges, and hub counts across all shells without referring to degree- or priority-defined sets; and (ii) power-law-bounded (PLB) degree families captured by PLB-U (upper tail), PLB-L (lower tail), and PLB-N (size-biased neighbor tail). The algorithms process vertices in degree bands. Hub–hub sparsity (from PLB-U via a weight pivot) gives bounded degeneracy within each band; R = O(1) independent micro-iterations of randomized greedy per phase stabilize progress by concentration. We expose a κ-fraction of edges per vertex using a per-edge public hash, and use PLB-N to sum the decaying band-mass effects across bands. Let γ = τ − 2 ∈ (0, 1) and choose any constant κ ∈ (0, 1/4). Then the per-phase survival probability for degree about B^J is exp(−Θ(BJ(γ − κ(1 − γ)))). Setting κ_eff = (γ − κ(1 − γ))/2 > 0 yields a double-exponential degree cascade Δᵢ₊₁ ≤ Δ_i1 − κ_eff with high probability. After O((1/κ_eff) log log n) phases, the maximum degree drops to polylog(n); any standard finisher with round complexity O(log Δ) + poly(log log n) then completes in O(log log n) rounds. Under geometry, the residual also finishes in O(log log n) rounds (and in O(1) on typical threshold-HRG instances). In CONGEST, messages are O(log n) bits per edge per round.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ankit Chauhan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: