PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association10 citationsOpen Access

Towards responsible artificial intelligence in healthcare—getting real about real-world data and evidence

View Full Paper
EKEileen KoskiADAmar K. DasPHPei-Yun Hsueh

Key Points

  • The expert panel recommends guidelines to improve the responsible use of real-world data in healthcare AI applications.
  • Recommendations include transparency frameworks, bias detection strategies, and the adoption of metadata standards for data sources.
  • A significant focus is placed on improving stakeholder engagement and establishing ongoing monitoring processes.
  • The development of comprehensive resources is crucial for ensuring safe, effective, and trustworthy AI applications in healthcare.

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement. Methods A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel’s work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months. Results The panel’s findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to “nutrition labels” for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes. Conclusion Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koski et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d9052941e1c178a14f5795https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations2019 · 6,910 citations
  2. 2Race/Ethnic Differences in the Associations of the Framingham Risk Factors with Carotid IMT and Cardiovascular Events2015 · 202 citations
  3. 3Defining AMIA’s artificial intelligence principles2021 · 119 citations
  4. 4Real-World Evidence — Where Are We Now?2022 · 224 citations
  5. 5Objective study validity diagnostics: a framework requiring pre-specified, empirical verification to increase trust in the reliability of real-world evidence2024 · 16 citations