This analysis reveals shifts in China's public diplomacy strategies in Indonesia, suggesting enhanced non-state involvement and new media use.
Chinese public diplomacy to Indonesia represents a charm offensive within its soft power strategy to enhance status and cultural image. This effort is driven by the rising interest of Indonesians in Chinese language and culture, despite China’s presence often being perceived as aggressive in international relations. Through public diplomacy, China proactively projects itself on the global stage, identifying Indonesia as a strategic partner capable of amplifying its positive image. This research analyzes China’s public diplomacy toward Indonesia under the administrations of Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping using the concept of public diplomacy. Findings show both administrations employed five key indicators: time, purpose, media/public opinion, and instruments of public diplomacy such as branding, cultural diplomacy, and exchange. The comparison reveals three major differences: instruments, agents, and targets. Under Hu Jintao, the Chinese government was the dominant actor, with the main goal of disseminating culture. In contrast, during Xi Jinping’s era, non-state actors and mass media collaboration complemented government involvement, with the broader objective of enhancing and promoting China’s branding. The Confucius Institute served as the primary instrument in both eras, though the products and programs differed. Hu Jintao’s period emphasized cultural exhibitions, while Xi Jinping’s diplomacy relied more on social media and internet platforms to reach wider audiences. Overall, China’s evolving approach reflects a shift from cultural dissemination to strategic branding and influence-building in Indonesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herdiani Narita Pricillia (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: