Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review categorizes explainable deepfake detection methods, emphasizing trustworthy outcomes in forensics and media verification.
As deepfake technology matures, its risks in spreading false information and threatening personal and societal security are escalating. Despite significant accuracy improvements in existing detection models, their inherent opacity limits their practical application in high-risk areas such as forensic investigations and news verification. To address this gap in trust, explainability has become a key research focus. This paper provides a systematic review of explainable deepfake detection methods, categorizing them into three main approaches: forensic analysis, which identifies physical or algorithmic manipulation traces; model-centric methods, which enhance transparency through post hoc explanations or pre-designed processes; and multimodal and natural language explanations, which translate results into human-understandable reports. The paper also examines evaluation frameworks, datasets, and current challenges, underscoring the necessity for trustworthy, reliable, and interpretable detection technologies in combating digital misinformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: