Analysis reveals that environmental subsidies lower carbon intensity, while pollution discharge fees may increase it, suggesting policy improvements are needed.
Against the backdrop of the "double carbon" goals, reducing the carbon intensi-ty of heavy-polluting enterprises with high energy consumption and carbon emis-sions has become crucial. As an important policy tool to guide green and low-carbon development, environmental regulation policies are indispensable for governing enterprise carbon intensity. This study focuses on two hetero-ge-neous environmental regulation tools—environmental subsidies and pollu-tion discharge fees—and selects 8,258 sample observations of Chinese listed compa-nies from 2011 to 2021 as the research object. The findings show that: Environ-mental subsidy policies can significantly reduce the carbon intensity of heavy-polluting enterprises, while pollution discharge fees exacerbate enter-prise carbon intensity to a certain extent.The research conclusions are of great signif-icance for improving environmental regulation policies and guiding heavy-polluting enterprises to save energy and reduce emissions, providing a realization path for achieving the carbon neutrality goal by 2060.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: