Retrospective analysis reveals LNG-IUS significantly improves bleeding patterns in women with HMB, suggesting high acceptability.
Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) affects quality of life and health in reproductive-age women. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) offers a conservative treatment option. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and acceptability of LNG-IUS in women with HMB. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 63 women (32-50 years) with HMB at Dr. RPGMC, Kangra, over two years. Follow-up was conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Data included demographics, clinical presentation, hematological investigations, ultrasonographic findings, follow-up outcomes, and patient satisfaction scores. Results: Mean age was 44.28 years; 50.79% were 45-50 years. Majority (68.25%) were para 2; 96.82% were married. Socioeconomic status varied, with 25.39% in the upper-lower class. The most common diagnosis was dysfunctional uterine bleeding (57.14%), followed by fibroid uterus (25.39%), adenomyosis (11.11%), and endometriosis (6.34%). Comorbidities included hypertension (15.87%) and diabetes (11.11%). Hemoglobin analysis showed moderate anemia in 52.38% and severe anemia in 26.98%. Bleeding patterns improved significantly: at 1 month, 57.14% had scanty flow; by 3 months, 74.60% reported reduced bleeding; at 6 months, 86.27% had scanty or no bleeding. By 12 months, 41.17% developed amenorrhea. Expulsion occurred in 2 cases; 2 others requested removal. Overall, 82.35% were satisfied with bleeding pattern; 98.03% had no dysmenorrhea. Social, sexual life, and mobility improved notably. Satisfaction assessment showed 80.38% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied. Conclusions: LNG-IUS is effective, safe, and well accepted for treating HMB, particularly in resource-limited settings. Its impact on reducing blood loss, correcting anemia, and improving life quality supports its wider use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thakur et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: