Observational analysis shows high sensitivity for miR-200c in lymph nodes, indicating potential as a biomarker.
Background/Objectives: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a well-established, minimally invasive method for sampling mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. It has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing lymph node involvement. However, achieving a definitive cytopathological diagnosis can be challenging owing to the limited presence of atypical tumor cells. The scanning single-molecule counting (SSMC) method enables rapid measurement of target molecule expression. This study assessed the correlation between miR-200c expression measured by SSMC and lymph node metastasis confirmed by cytopathology. Methods: Following EBUS-TBNA in patients with lung cancer or suspected lung cancer, we flushed 22-gauge biopsy needles with 1 mL saline and extracted microRNA (miRNA) from the lavage fluid. The quality of SSMC results for miR-200c was evaluated and compared with that of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Results: Linear regression analysis of miR-200c between SSMC and RT-qPCR showed a statistically significant positive correlation (R2 = 0.81, p < 0.0001), demonstrating the feasibility of SSMC for evaluating miRNA in lymph nodes. Based on these findings, we enrolled and analyzed 100 lymph nodes from 86 patients. High miR-200c expression detected lymph node metastasis with high sensitivity (85.7%) and specificity (83.3%) and an AUC of 0.88. No discordance was observed between the standard SSMC and rapid methods. Conclusions: The expression of miR-200c, as measured by SSMC, may serve as a biomarker for molecular nodal staging. The rapid SSMC method provides results within 30 min, significantly faster than conventional RT-qPCR, and may complement rapid on-site cytological evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sata et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: