Observational analysis shows mixed results on bilingual advantage for executive functioning in children with spina bifida, suggesting implications for cognitive development.
Objective To examine whether a bilingual advantage in executive functioning (EF) exists among children with Spina Bifida (SB), a population known to experience EF difficulties. While there is extensive research on a potential bilingual advantage in EF among typically developing children, little is known about this effect in children with SB. Method Sixty-three children with SB (ages 4 – 19) were grouped into bilingual (n = 31) and monolingual (n = 32) cohorts. EF was assessed using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Second Edition (BRIEF-2), a standardized parent-report measure, and the Tower of London – Drexel University, 2nd Edition (ToL), a performance-based task. Additional domains evaluated included intellectual functioning, attention, language, memory, visual-motor and fine motor skills, academics, adaptive behavior, and emotional/behavioral functioning. Results Bilingual children demonstrated significantly better parent-reported EF, specifically in cognitive regulation, including initiation and task-monitoring. No significant group differences emerged on the ToL or other BRIEF-2 scales. Monolingual children outperformed bilingual peers on language-based tasks, including verbal memory and academic subtests. Moderation analyses revealed no effects of age or home language on EF; however, regression analysis indicated that home language and vocabulary were significantly associated with parent-reported initiation abilities. Conclusion These findings provide partial support for a bilingual advantage in specific aspects of EF, particularly self-regulatory processes. However, this advantage did not extend to broader EF domains or performance-based measures, underscoring the complexity of EF in pediatric medical populations and the need for further research into subdomains and the role of language dominance in shaping potential bilingual advantages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabrales et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: