PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2025Dentomaxillofacial Radiology2 citations

Single-step prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction using contrastive learning and bayesian auto-tuned deep learning model

View Full Paper
KYKyubaek YoonYCYiseul ChoiMLMyoungho Lee

Key Points

  • The deep learning model achieved F1-scores of 0.923 using CBCT images, surpassing human performance.
  • Contrastive learning enhanced model's F1-scores significantly, improving MobileNetV2 from 0.302 to 0.740.
  • Bayesian optimization further boosted F1-scores, with improvements noted across all model architectures.
  • AI showed stronger predictive capability in CBCT images compared to panoramic radiographs, showcasing the need for further expert input.

Abstract

Abstract Objective Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is a critical complication of mandibular third molar extraction. This study aimed to construct and evaluate a deep learning framework that integrates contrastive learning and Bayesian optimization to enhance predictive performance on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic radiographs. Methods A retrospective dataset of 902 panoramic radiographs and 1,500 CBCT images was used. Five deep learning architectures (MobileNetV2, ResNet101D, Vision Transformer, Twins-SVT, and SSL-ResNet50) were trained with and without contrastive learning and Bayesian optimization. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, and comparison with oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFSs). Results Contrastive learning significantly improved the F1-scores across all models (e.g., MobileNetV2: 0.302 to 0.740; ResNet101D: 0.188 to 0.689; Vision Transformer: 0.275 to 0.704; Twins-SVT: 0.370 to 0.719; SSL-ResNet50: 0.109 to 0.576). Bayesian optimization further enhanced the F1-scores for MobileNetV2 (from 0.740 to 0.923), ResNet101D (from 0.689 to 0.857), Vision Transformer (from 0.704 to 0.871), Twins-SVT (from 0.719 to 0.857), and SSL-ResNet50 (from 0.576 to 0.875). The AI model outperformed OMFSs on CBCT cross-sectional images (F1-score: 0.923 vs. 0.667) but underperformed on panoramic radiographs (0.666 vs. 0.730). Conclusions The proposed single-step deep learning approach effectively predicts IAN injury, with contrastive learning addressing data imbalance and Bayesian optimization optimizing model performance. While artificial intelligence surpasses human performance in CBCT images, panoramic radiographs analysis still benefits from expert interpretation. Future work should focus on multi-center validation and explainable artificial intelligence for broader clinical adoption.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d90a0641e1c178a14f6407https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper