Two novel species, Micromonospora psammae and Micromonospora lacuserhaii, were discovered, suggesting diverse habitats influence strain characteristics.
Three strains – CPCC 205556 T and CPCC 205543 isolated from gravel soil in China’s Gurbantunggut Desert and CPCC 205547 T obtained from Erhai Lake in Yunnan – were characterized as Gram-stain-positive, orange to dark brown-pigmented actinobacteria. These isolates were mesophilic, exhibiting optimal growth at pH 7.0–8.0. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences placed these isolates within the genus Micromonospora , with high similarity (>99%) to Micromonospora solifontis NBRC 113441 T and Micromonospora veneta DSM 109713 T . Chemotaxonomic analyses (fatty acids, polar lipids and peptidoglycan) and the genomic G+C content further supported their classification within Micromonospora . However, whole-genome comparisons revealed distinct taxonomic relationships: strains CPCC 205556 T and CPCC 205543 shared 85.6–85.7% average nucleotide identity (ANI) and 33.5% digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) with Micromonospora auratinigra DSM 44815 T , while CPCC 205547 T shared 85.7% of ANI and 32.0% of dDDH with Micromonospora coxensis JCM 13248 T . Notably, CPCC 205556 T and CPCC 205543 exhibited near-identical genomic relatedness (ANI=99.3%, dDDH=93.3%), confirming their status as a single novel species. Based on these findings, two novel species were proposed: Micromonospora psammae sp. nov. (type strain CPCC 205556 T =MS1047 T =KCTC 59310 T ), representing the desert isolates, and Micromonospora lacuserhaii sp. nov. (type strain CPCC 205547 T =EH501 T =KCTC 59309 T ) from the lake habitat. Genomic analysis highlighted their biosynthetic potential for specialized metabolites, consistent with the genus’s recognized metabolic diversity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: