This protocol successfully implements CRISPR/Cas9 for gene modification in Physcomitrium patens, indicating efficiency compared to traditional methods.
The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system is a widely used programmable nuclease system for gene modification in many organisms, including Physcomitrium patens. P. patens is a model species of moss plants, a basal land plant group, which has been extensively studied from the viewpoint of evolution and diversity of green plant lineages. So far, gene modifications by CRISPR/Cas9 in P. patens have been carried out exclusively by the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated DNA transfer method, in which a transgene (or transgenes) is introduced into protoplast cells prepared from protonemal tissues. However, this PEG-mediated method requires a relatively large amount of transgene DNA (typically 30 µg for a single transformation), consists of many steps, and is time-consuming. Additionally, this PEG-mediated method has only been established in a few species of moss. In the current protocol, we succeeded in CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis of P. patens genes by making good use of the biolistic method, which i) requires amounts of transgene DNA as low as 5 μg for each vector, ii) consists of fewer steps and is time-saving, and iii) is known to be applicable to a wide variety of species of plants. Key features • In this protocol, particle bombardment-mediated gene transfer is used for CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutagenesis in the moss Physcomitrium patens. • By this application of particle bombardment, a gene can be modified by the CRISPR/Cas9 system much more conveniently with a smaller amount of transgene DNA. • This protocol is expected to be easily applicable to non-model moss species, some of which have noteworthy traits, such as tolerance to various stresses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takenaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: