Conductometric method effectively estimates Fe2+ in water, suggesting advancements over colorimetric techniques.
Iron content is one of the important parameters of water quality. Permanganometric method is a very common technique to estimate Fe2+ ion. However, this technique fails to estimate Fe3+ ion but water sample contains both Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions. Colourimetric method is popular to estimate iron content in a given water sample. However, it has some limitations e.g., the method is sensitive to pH and temperature. Furthermore, the method is applicable to a limited concentration range. The present work proposed a novel technique, conductometric method, to estimate iron content in a given water sample. The method is based on change in ionic conductance of Fe2+ ion during formation of iron-phenanthroline complex. A calibration curve is obtained while plotting change in ionic conductance values against known concentrations of Fe2+ ion. Using this calibration curve unknown concentration of Fe2+ ion in a given sample water can be determined by measuring corresponding change in ionic conductance of Fe2+ ion in presence of 1,10 phenanthroline. This novel technique is applicable in a wide concentration range. In the present work two unknown samples with concentrations, 0.084 (N/100) and 0.20 (N/100), are used. Using the calibration curves the corresponding concentrations are found to be 0.085 (N/100) and 0.19 (N/100) respectively, indicating that the experimental results are very close to the actual values. The other advantages of this method are: (a) it is simple and easy to perform anywhere, (b) it is cost-effective, (c) the accuracy of the method does not depend on either pH or temperature of experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mallick et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: