September 28, 2025Governance

Is Algorithmic Accessibility Sufficient? The Pivotal Role of Accessibility and Accountability in Shaping Trust in Automated Decision‐Making

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HLH. Li ZSZongfeng SunQingdao University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Survey experiments reveal that accountability significantly influences trust in automated decision-making, indicating nuanced dynamics with accessibility.

Key Points

Algorithmic accountability has a stronger impact on trust than algorithmic accessibility, highlighting key differences in their roles.
Participants’ trust preferences vary significantly depending on the levels of accessibility and accountability in automated systems.
The interaction of accountability with decision risks showcases the complexity of trust perceptions in different scenarios.
Empirical findings provide insights into the necessity of considering both accessibility and accountability when assessing trust in algorithms.

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d90a0f41e1c178a14f6a5e https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70067

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Survey experiments reveal that accountability significantly influences trust in automated decision-making, indicating nuanced dynamics with accessibility.

Is Algorithmic Accessibility Sufficient? The Pivotal Role of Accessibility and Accountability in Shaping Trust in Automated Decision‐Making

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Is Algorithmic Accessibility Sufficient? The Pivotal Role of Accessibility and Accountability in Shaping Trust in Automated Decision‐Making

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider