This analysis demonstrates improved energy densities in all-solid-state lithium batteries using zirconium-based halides and interfacial stabilization.
The interfacial stability between halide solid‐state electrolytes and anodes directly affects their application in commercial all‐solid‐state lithium batteries, especially for low‐cost zirconium‐based halides. However, few research are done on interfacial reactions. This study elucidates the dynamic processes of the interface between Li 2 ZrCl 6 and Li–In alloy, that is, indium atoms are oxidized and incorporated into Li 2 ZrCl 6 , while zirconium atoms are partially reduced to balance the charge changes, resulting in an ion‐conductive interface stabilization layer of Li 2 (Zr 4+ a Zr 3+ b Zr 2+ c ) (4‐3 x )+ In 3+ x Cl 6 (0 < x < 1/3, a + b + c = 1). Based on this mechanism, the LiCoO 2 │Li 2 ZrCl 6 │Li–In cell with single‐layer halide solid‐state electrolyte is constructed for the first time, showing satisfying electrochemical performance with an initial Coulombic efficiency of 97.1% and a capacity retention rate of 78.7% after 300 cycles. Compared with the common LiCoO 2 │Li 2 ZrCl 6 │Li 6 PS 5 Cl│Li–In cell with halide and sulfide dual‐layer solid‐state electrolyte, the gravimetric and volumetric energy densities of the all‐solid‐state lithium pouch batteries are increased by 6.7% and 9%, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: