Interventional study shows intense pulsed light as effective monotherapy for acne vulgaris, suggesting a favorable safety profile.
Introduction: Acne vulgaris is an exceedingly common chronic disease of the pilosebaceous unit, affecting approximately 40 million adolescents and 25 million adults. Additionally to the potential for long-term scarring and disfigurement, acne vulgaris carries a significant psychosocial morbidity including social withdrawal, clinical depressive disorder, and suicide. Aims: To determine the role of Intense Pulsed Light in the treatment of all grades of acne. Materials & Methods: The present study was an Interventional study. This Study was conducted from One year at Department of Dermatology in a tertiary care hospital. Total 81 patients were included in this study. Result: In this study, the most commonly reported side effect was erythema, observed in 13 patients (16.05%), and followed by itching in 5 patients (6.17%) and burning sensation in 3 patients (3.70%). The side effects were generally mild and manageable, indicating a favourable safety profile for the treatment used. Conclusion: We concluded that, intense Pulsed Light (IPL) therapy, used as monotherapy in this study, proved to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment modality for acne. A significant reduction in lesion count was observed over successive sessions, with the majority of patients showing good to excellent clinical improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manjeeta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: