Multiple-case analysis reveals governance typologies that enhance strategic ambidexterity in SSE organizations, indicating effective adaptation strategies.
Moroccan Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) organizations operate at the intersection of participatory norms and performance-driven expectations, confronting governance challenges rarely captured in Global-North scholarship. Adopting an abductive, multiple-case design, this study investigates how six SSE entities—cooperatives, mutual-benefit associations, and social enterprises—translate institutional plurality into strategic effectiveness. Documentary analysis, thirty semi-structured interviews, and non-participant observation reveal a tripartite governance typology: consensus-anchored models that prioritise egalitarian deliberation yet suffer protracted decision cycles; hybrid-modular structures that superimpose task-specific committees and balanced-scorecard dashboards onto member assemblies; and managerialised configurations dominated by competency-based boards and real-time KPI monitoring. Hybrid-modular organizations achieve superior ambidexterity, coupling democratic participation with formal controls to diversify revenue streams, accelerate decision latency, and enhance stakeholder legitimacy. Three recurring tensions—regulatory ambiguity versus standardisation, social-impact fidelity versus revenue pursuit, and territorial legitimacy versus scalability—act as generative forces when addressed through iterative “logic-bricolage” routines such as layered formalisation, temporal sequencing, and boundary realignment. The findings reframe governance as a path-dependent capability that orchestrates micro-level structural tweaks into macro-level resilience, extending hybrid-organization theory into contexts shaped by Islamic-finance proximity and state-led performance agendas. Practically, the study recommends governance-maturity roadmaps for managers and incentive schemes that reward incremental formalisation for policymakers. Future research should employ longitudinal and mixed-method designs to test the transferability of the logic-bricolage model across MENA ecosystems. Keywords : governance hybridity ; strategic ambidexterity ; Social and Solidarity Economy ; dynamic capabilities ; institutional logics ; Morocco ; logic bricolage. Received Date: July 19, 2025 Accepted Date: August 11, 2025 Published Date: August 30, 2025 Available Online at https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/424
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SAFIANI et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: