Quasi-experimental design finds AI-assisted instruction boosts mathematics performance in pre-service teachers, highlighting collaborative learning benefits.
Conventional teaching methods still dominate in Colleges of Education in Ghana, relying on rote learning rather than critical thinking or problem-solving. This study adopted a positivist research philosophy, employing scientific and quantitative methods to objectively explore the causal effect of AI-assisted instruction on pre-service teachers’ mathematics performance. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design with non-random assignment, two public Colleges of Education in Ghana's Ashanti Region were selected, involving 100 Level 400 students split evenly into experimental and control groups. Pre-tests established baseline performance, and the group with the lower average became the experimental group. The intervention consisted of eight AI-assisted mathematics lessons on linear equations delivered in a collaborative learning environment, while the control group received conventional instruction. Post-test results analyzed using SPSS and Independent Samples t-tests revealed a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group’s performance. These findings indicate that AI-assisted instruction in a collaborative setting significantly enhances mathematics achievement among pre-service teachers, highlighting the transformative potential of integrating technology in teacher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maanu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: